An autonomous research institute under the Ministry of Finance

 

blog author image

The revenue shortfalls are offset by expenditure compression, keeping the headline deficit on target.

Fin­ance Min­is­ter Nirmala Sithara­man presen­ted the Budget for 2026-27 at a moment of heightened global uncer­tainty. Trade ten­sions, shift­ing mon­et­ary policy in advanced eco­nom­ies and per­sist­ent sup­ply-chain fra­gil­it­ies all loom large.

Mar­kets showed a short-term “ran­dom-walk” reac­tion to higher STT on deriv­at­ives. Yet the Budget responds with fiscal con­sol­id­a­tion drive and for­ward-look­ing invest­ment that should strengthen India’s growth tra­ject­ory while pre­serving mac­roe­co­nomic sta­bil­ity.

DEBT AND DEFICITS

With the fiscal defi­cit tar­geted at 4.3 per cent of GDP for 2026-27 — down from the 4.4 per cent revised estim­ate for 2025-26 — the gov­ern­ment has reaffirmed its com­mit­ment to gradual con­sol­id­a­tion, align­ing with a medium-term path toward below 4 per cent. This steady adjust­ment is com­mend­able.

The primary defi­cit is 0.7 per cent of GDP for FY27, rev­enue defi­cit remained con­stant at 1.5 per cent. Phas­ing out of rev­enue defi­cit is ‘golden prin­ciple’ of fiscal rules, however it is not advis­able in times of mac­roe­co­nomic uncer­tain­ties and geo­pol­it­ical risks.

The debt-to-GDP ratio is estim­ated to be 55.6 per cent of GDP in BE 2026-27, com­pared to 56.1 per cent of GDP in RE 2025-26, with a medium-term anchor of 50 per cent (±1 per cent) by 2030-31. A crit­ical reform addresses off-budget bor­row­ings (OBBs), long cri­ti­cised by 16th Fin­ance Com­mis­sion for opa­city.

To fin­ance the fiscal defi­cit, the net mar­ket bor­row­ings from dated secur­it­ies are estim­ated at ₹11.7 lakh crore. The bal­ance of debt fin­an­cing is expec­ted to come from small sav­ings and other sources. The gross mar­ket bor­row­ings are estim­ated at ₹17.2 lakh crore. Gen­eral gov­ern­ment debt dynam­ics bene­fit from these meas­ures, along­side con­tained gross mar­ket bor­row­ings and efforts to lengthen debt matur­it­ies.

FISCAL MARKSMANSHIP

Fiscal marks­man­ship under­scores prag­matic man­age­ment. In 2025-26, rev­enue short­falls — partly due to mod­er­ated buoy­ancy — were offset by expendit­ure com­pres­sion, keep­ing the head­line defi­cit on tar­get des­pite fore­cast­ing vari­ances. Effect­ive cap­ital expendit­ure was adjus­ted down­ward, yet the over­all con­sol­id­a­tion path remained intact.

This respons­ive recal­ib­ra­tion pre­serves cred­ib­il­ity, demon­strat­ing that rev­enue sta­bil­ity anchors expendit­ure plan­ning while allow­ing flex­ib­il­ity amid uncer­tain­ties. Closer ana­lysis of fore­cast­ing errors — whether sys­temic or ran­dom — could fur­ther refine future budgets.

CAPEX, PVT INVESTMENT

Cap­ital expendit­ure remains a key growth driver, with Cent­ral out­lay at ₹12.2 lakh crore and effect­ive capex (includ­ing state sup­port) reach­ing ₹17.15 lakh crore. This multi-year pipeline provides pre­dict­ab­il­ity, car­ry­ing high mul­ti­pli­ers in an eco­nomy where private cor­por­ate sec­tor is well posi­tioned to respond.

Years of delever­aging have strengthened bal­ance sheets, with debt-to-equity ratios at multi-dec­ade lows and interest cov­er­age ratios improved.

Bank­ing sec­tor non-per­form­ing loans have sta­bil­ised, free­ing credit chan­nels. A mean­ing­ful pick up in private capex cycles in 2026-27 can be expec­ted, if there is an eas­ing to the “demand uncer­tain­ties” amidst mac­roe­co­nomic and geo­pol­it­ical risks.

AI, CLIMATE REFORMS

Arti­fi­cial intel­li­gence receives ₹10,000 crore for the National AI Mis­sion (com­pute infra­struc­ture, skilling 10 mil­lion youth) and a ₹5,000 crore Innov­a­tion Fund for quantum, semi­con­duct­ors, and bio­tech­no­logy, with enhanced R&D deduc­tions. The Budget has announced a 20-year tax hol­i­day to for­eign firms using local data centres built in India.

Energy trans­ition announce­ments include the National Crit­ical Min­er­als Mis­sion, expan­ded with ded­ic­ated Rare Earth Cor­ridors in Odisha, Ker­ala, Andhra Pra­desh, and Tamil Nadu, integ­rat­ing min­ing, pro­cessing, and mag­net man­u­fac­tur­ing to address pro­jec­ted quad­rupling of global rare earth demand by 2040.

16TH FINANCE PANEL

The Budget aligns closely with the 16th Fin­ance Com­mis­sion’s recom­mend­a­tions for fiscal con­sol­id­a­tion while main­tain­ing a status quo tax trans­fers at 41 per cent of divis­ible pool to the States, pri­or­it­ising mac­roe­co­nomic sta­bil­ity.

The fiscal fore­cast­ing errors in rev­enue and expendit­ure need to be fol­lowed up to under­stand the sources of errors — if sys­temic bias or ran­dom­ness affected the fiscal arith­metic.

There is a shadow of 16th Fin­ance Com­mis­sion on this Budget. With the new tax trans­fer for­mula — Pop­u­la­tion 2011 (17.5 per cent) and income dis­tance (42.5 per cent) take the lion share in weight­age with 60 per cent total. The rest 40 per cent weight­age is equally divided for four vari­ables — demo­graphic trans­ition, forest, area and con­tri­bu­tion of a State to GDP.

THE FINEPRINT

The devil lies in the details. It is inter­est­ing to note that 16th Com­mis­sion’s hori­zontal for­mula intro­duces a not­able tilt towards efficiency, reportedly incor­por­at­ing a new 10 per cent weight for States’ con­tri­bu­tion to national GDP along­side other cri­teria of income dis­tance, area, cli­mate and demo­graphic per­form­ance.

This marks a depar­ture from heav­ier equity focus in prior Com­mis­sions towards stra­tegic growth.

The Budget has taken the third tier (cit­ies) also as core part­ners in this jour­ney towards Viksit Bharat, with announce­ments relate to “cit­ies as the unit of ana­lysis” and ini­ti­at­ing alloc­a­tions to float muni­cipal bonds.

The fiscal space of sub­n­a­tional gov­ern­ments is there­fore a major factor in pur­su­ing the Viksit Bharat dream to become a developed coun­try by 2047.

(This article was first published in The Hindu Business line on February 2, 2026. https://www.pressreader.com/india/businessline-hyderabad-9wvx/20260203/281814290293626)


 
Lekha Chakraborty is Professor, NIPFP and Research Associate of Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, New York and Member, Governing Board of International Institute of Public Finance (IIPF) Munich.
 
The views expressed in the post are those of the authors only. No responsibility for them should be attributed to NIPFP.